Cases 111 - 120 of 30,698
PETTICORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
GLYNN PETTICORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GRANGER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
DERRICK GRANGER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland v. Ombudsman Bureau et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Defendant:
Centuerion Health, Charlene A Burkett, English and others
Plaintiff:
Martize Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
NIGEL T. JOYNER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, A. FENI, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunaway v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00441
Petitioner:
Chad A Dunaway
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Schererville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant:
Schererville Police Department, Schererville Police Dept, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
