Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 171 - 180 of 1,255
Lawuya v. USA
as 3:2022cv00016
Petitioner: Penja Sakiri Lawuya
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BraveBull v. FBOP et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Plaintiff: Pamela BraveBull
Defendant: FBOP, F.C.I. Waseca, MN, Warden M. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basic v. USA
as 1:2022cv00014
Petitioner: Elvis Basic
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ballensky v. North Dakota State et al
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff: Jerric Donald Ballensky
Defendant: North Dakota State and North Dakota State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. State of North Dakota We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00197
Petitioner: Ashley Kenneth Hunter
Respondent: State of North Dakota and Warden James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zarco v. USA
as 3:2021cv00223
Petitioner: Miguel Zarco
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McGinnis v. North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff: Neil Adams McGinnis
Defendant: North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Mr. David Krabbenhoft, Mr. Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Plaintiff: Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant: Federal Public Defenders Office, Jason J. Tupman and Edward Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Cass County Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00207
Petitioner: Roger Jackson
Respondent: Cass County Court and North Dakota State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGinnis v. Slayer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00191
Petitioner: Neil Adams McGinnis
Respondent: Wardon Slayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?