Cases 21 - 30 of 568
Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Employees et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Daniel Pippinger
Defendant:
Buncombe County Government Employees, FNU LNU, Central Medical Industries & Medidex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. N.C. PRISON OFFICIALS OF WAKE COUNTY
as 1:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
N.C. PRISON OFFICIALS OF WAKE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. D.T.A.R.C. et al
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
D.T.A.R.C., F.T.A.R.C., N.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bellinger et al
as 5:2023ct03313
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
D. Bellinger and J. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romo v. Heckard
as 5:2023hc02215
Petitioner:
Daniel Hernandez Romo
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
