Cases 31 - 40 of 292
GRIZZEL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GRIZZEL
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ABBY BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 5:2023ct03088
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Antonio Patterson
Defendant:
Cristol Adams, Ennis Wright and Major T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
LLOYD OBED ADAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
AUGHENBAUGH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Respondent:
ADAM SMITH and TA'KAIYA GAINEY-LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Propst
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Adam W. Hall
Defendant:
FNU Propst and Foothills Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY MILLER and DAVID HENRY-MILLER
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., HENRY NORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00044
Petitioner:
Martavius Adams
Respondent:
Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Zimmerman et al
as 5:2023ct03006
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Watson
Defendant:
Sgt. Zimmerman, Anthony Adams, L. Balance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. MCLAIN
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
JAMES MCCAIN and JAMES MCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
