Cases 31 - 40 of 22,870
Phillips v. Ivey
as 4:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Whittle et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Whittle and Officer Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Marenzo Marquis Roberts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Deontae L Hudson
Defendant:
Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
