Cases 41 - 50 of 30,546
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. LEONARD et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Defendant:
C. LEONARD, RONNIE BEST, JAMES FURLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI
Respondent:
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00522
Petitioner:
John Jamar Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Carroll et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll, FNU Adkins and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
