Cases 61 - 70 of 608
Nichols v. Strickland
as 5:2022ct03292
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Nichols
Defendant:
Jodie B. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLARD v. ROBERTSON et al
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD
Defendant:
C. K. ROBERTSON, B. S. VALENTINE, B. VALENTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2022ct03211
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Lassiter, Todd E. Ishee, Shelia Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2022ct03209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Lynn B. Kelly and Lieutenant Lipscomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ruff v. Deas et al
as 5:2022ct03186
Plaintiff:
Marquette Ruff
Defendant:
Sgt. Deas, C/O B. Molander and Correctional Officer Appenheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. VEAL et al
as 1:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
L. VEAL, LAVALLEY, B. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02095
Petitioner:
Jessi White
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rogers v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022ct03178
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lide Rogers
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Warden Morris G. Reid and Dr. Brian B. Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02083
Petitioner:
David Anthony Bryan
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02081
Petitioner:
Bennelle Marquett Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
