Cases 61 - 70 of 675
Bolden v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12497
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden
Defendant:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White #838737 v. Chippewa Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Marquise White #838737
Defendant:
Chippewa Correctional Facility, Unknown Desrochers, Chippewa Correctional Facility Warden's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitan v. Maclean et al
as 2:2023cv12439
Plaintiff:
Randall Richard Levitan
Defendant:
Maclean, Johnson, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12158
Plaintiff:
Jashaan Edwards
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Saginaw Correctional Facility, Unknown and others
Moore v. Saph
as 5:2023cv11815
Plaintiff:
Ricky Moore
Defendant:
J. Saph, E. Parr-Mirza, John Doe and others
Quill v. Wayne County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv11724
Petitioner:
Sophia Quill
Defendant:
John Does
Respondent:
Wayne County Sheriff, Wayne County Jail, Michigan, State of and others
Hadley v. John Doe et al
as 2:2023cv11702
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hadley
Defendant:
John Doe, Gary Miniard and Richard D Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv11666
Plaintiff:
Javan Jerrelle Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathanael Smith, John Doe, Brian Shipman and others
McGinnis v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv11610
Plaintiff:
Leslie McGinnis
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, O'Brien, John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
