Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Lonardo v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff: Thomas James Lonardo
Defendant: Rick Raemisch, David Booth, Garret Gebheart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garret Lemon v. USA
as 16-35868
Petitioner - Appellee: GARRET TYLER LEMON
Respondent - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kirven et al v. Garret et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01110
Plaintiff: Loydale Kirven and Ignacia Kirven
Defendant: Jan Garret, Curry County Detention Center and Clovis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Campos v. Beeville Police Department, et al
as 16-41291
Plaintiff - Appellant: ORLANDO CAMPOS
Defendant - Appellee: BEEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIS BERNAL, JOHN BERRY and others
Garret Taplin v. Kim Holland
as 16-56269
Petitioner - Appellant: GARRET EDWARD TAPLIN
Respondent - Appellee: KIM HOLLAND, Warden
Seymour v. King
as 1:2016cv23712
Plaintiff: Linton Seymour
Defendant: Garret King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy DeBose v. TDCJ Parole Division, et al
as 16-20513
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEROY DEBOSE
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION, WILLIAM STEPHENS, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutions Division, Executive Director, STEWART JENKINS, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Division Director and others
LIGHTFOOT v RIDLEY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00338
Plaintiff: ANDRE D LIGHTFOOT
Defendant: RIDLEY and GARRET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debose v. TDCJ Parole Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv02120
Petitioner: Leroy Debose
Defendant: TDCJ Parole Division, William Stephens, Stewart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfoot v. Ridley et al
as 1:2016cv02117
Plaintiff: Andre D. Lightfoot
Defendant: Ridley and Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?