Miller Act Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
The United States of America for the use and benefit of IGW Electric, LLC v. Scarborough We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00200
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of IGW Electric, LLC
Defendant: Edmund Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF EDMUND SCARBOROUGH et al v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv01616
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF EDMUND SCARBOROUGH and UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ALLYSON-DELCOR, INC.
Defendant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DTC ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
FTH Mechanical, LLC v. Vistacon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00024
Plaintiff: FTH Mechanical, LLC
Defendant: Edmund Scarborough, Yvonne Scarborough, The IBCS Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
US for the use of Norshield v. E. C. Scarborough
as 12-1020
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF NORSHIELD SECURITY PRODUCTS LLC, d/b/a Norshield Security Products and NORSHIELD SECURITY PRODUCTS LLC
Defendant - Appellant: E. C. SCARBOROUGH, as Surety
Defendant: DYNAMIC CORPORATION, as Principal Obligor
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, L.P. et al v. Tommy Abbott & Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00653
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, L.P. and Vulcan Construction Materials, L.P.
Defendant: Tommy Abbott & Associates, Inc., Wendel Hartman and Edmund Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act
HD Supply Construction Supply Ltd v. Tommy Abbott and Associates Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv09195
Defendant: Tommy Abbott, Does, Wendel Hartman and others
Plaintiff: HD Supply Construction Supply Ltd
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF SHAMROCK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al v. DTC ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv05677
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES and SHAMROCK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
Defendant: DTC ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC., FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLYSON-DELCOR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of ProBuild Company, LLC et al v. Scarborough et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00451
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of ProBuild Company, LLC and ProBuild Company, LLC
Defendant: Edmund Scarborough, Tommy Abbott & Associates, Inc., Tommy Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America f/u/b/o American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc., etc. v. Tommy Abbott & Associates, Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv00440
Plaintiff: The United States of America f/u/b/o American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc.
Defendant: Tommy Abbott & Associates, Inc., Edmund Scarborough , Tommy Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Michael Frederick Paving Corporation et al v Tommy Abbott and Associates, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv03589
Defendant: Does, Edmund Scarborough and Tommy Abbott and Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Frederick Paving Corporation and Michael Frederick Paving Corporation
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?