Cases 1 - 10 of 22
KRUEGER v. ALFORD et al
as 2:2019cv18652
Defendant:
JOSEPH C. PAPA, RONALD L. WINOWIECKI, DONAL O'CONNOR and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN R. KRUEGER
ROSENBLATT v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Defendant:
Albert H Burstein, David W. Petty, EXACTECH INC and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Eugene Towers v. Robert Iger, et al
as 17-15770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE F. TOWERS, Derivatively on Behalf of The Walt Disney Company
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. IGER, ALAN BERGMAN, EDWIN CATMULL and others
Bowser v. Mayer et al
as 5:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Jay Bowser
Defendant:
Marissa A. Mayer, David Filo, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Summer v. Mayer et al
as 5:2017cv00787
Plaintiff:
David Summer
Defendant:
Marissa A. Mayer, David Filo, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Peltz et al
as 1:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
James Graham
Defendant:
Nelson Peltz, Peter W May, Emil J Brolick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Towers v. Iger et al
as 5:2015cv04609
Plaintiff:
Eugene F. Towers
Defendant:
Robert A. Iger , Alan Bergman , Edwin Catmull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dadachanji v. CommScope, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kavasji F Dadachanji
Defendant:
CommScope, Inc., Frank M Drendel, Marvin S Edwards, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley Smith v. Franklin/Templeton Distributor, et al
as 10-17648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY C. SMITH, derivatively on behalf of Franklin Custodian Funds
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN/TEMPLETON DISTRIBUTORS, INC., CHARLES B. JOHNSON, RUPERT H. JOHNSON and others
Barletta v. Actel Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv04703
Plaintiff:
Gloria Barletta
Defendant:
Actel Corporation, John C East, Jeffrey C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
