Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Lewis v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Lewis
Defendant:
Matthew A. Hill, Margie Joanne Hill, David Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peter Adams v. Kake Tribal Corporation, et al
as 22-35134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION, JEFFREY W. HILLS and ROBERT D. MILLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434 IRS: Civil Damages for Fraudulent Filing of Information
HOY v. HOY et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. HOY
Defendant:
JOHN J. HOY, III, JOHN J. HOY JR. AND JEANETTE N. HOY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and HOYS HOLLY HILL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lieble v. Hill-Rom Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
Chris Lieble
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc, John P Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Lyon III v. Aron et al
as 1:2021cv07940
Plaintiff:
John R Lyon and John R. Lyon III
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Adam M Aron, Craig R Ramsey and others
Greenhaus et al v. Gersh et al
as 2:2021cv04849
Plaintiff:
Ellynn Greenhaus, Laurie Gersh and West Hills Day Camp, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin Gersh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Adams v. Kake Tribal Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Kake Tribal Corporation, Jeffrey W. Hills and Robert D. Mills
Plaintiff:
Peter Adams
In Re stamps.com Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Kenneth T. McBride, G. Bradford Jones, Theodore R. Samuels, II and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joey Hill
Petitioner:
Michael Rado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
