Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Pickens v. Garber et al
as 1:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Pickens
Defendant:
Scott Garber and Goldmax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Pickens v. Gold Max, et al
as 14-15105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. PICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
GOLD MAX and SCOTT GARBER
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. G&R Electrical Construction Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00632
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
G&R Electrical Construction Inc , George H Picken, Jr and Amanda K Picken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pickens v. Gold Max et al
as 1:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Pickens
Defendant:
Gold Max and Scott Garber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Park Sterling Bank v. Community Bank of Pickens County
as 2:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
Park Sterling Bank
Defendant:
Community Bank of Pickens County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott McNamara v. Catherine Picken, et al
as 13-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott A. McNamara, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Catherine A. Picken, M.D. and Washington ENT Group, PLLC
CLINTON RUBIN, LLC v. PICKENS et al
as 2:2013cv04483
Plaintiff:
CLINTON RUBIN, LLC
Defendant:
S. SCOTT PICKENS and JAMIE BETH SOLAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robin Blackwell, Marcia Howard, Constance Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Associated Asphalt Inc v. Pickens Construction Inc
as 8:2012cv00487
Plaintiff:
Associated Asphalt Inc
Defendant:
Pickens Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNAMARA v. PICKEN et al
as 1:2011cv01051
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. MCNAMARA
Defendant:
CATHERINE A. PICKEN and WASHINGTON ENT GROUP, PLLC
Counter_claimant:
CATHERINE A. PICKEN and WASHINGTON ENT GROUP, PLLC
Counter_defendant:
SCOTT A. MCNAMARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
