Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Owens v. (PMBDA) PA Minority Business Development Authority of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Owens
Defendant:
(PMBDA) PA Minority Business Development Authority of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, John S. Picconi, Tom Wolfe and others
Amicus Curiae:
SBA Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GIBSON et al
as 5:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
RAINY GIBSON and RAINY GIBSON CORP SOLE doing business as RAINY MARIE GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORCON, INC. v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2021cv10146
Defendant:
DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and Champion Painting Specialty Services Corp
Plaintiff:
CORCON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xi Chin Clan Nation et al v. Queen Elizabeth, et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Katherine Gilmore Richardson, Cherelle Parker, Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Guale Yamassee Juris Consul Office, RLH Maat Law Office, The Indigenous Law Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Alien Tort Claims Act
FRAZIER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05352
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alpha Painting & Construction v. Delaware River Port Authority
as 16-3791
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALPHA PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION CO INC
Defendant - Appellant:
DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA & STATE OF NEW JERSEY
ALPHA PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv05141
Plaintiff:
ALPHA PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cicchiello v. SEIU 1199P Union et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Cicchiello
Defendant:
SEIU 1199P Union, Service Employees International Union, Kim Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
as 13-2287
Plaintiff:
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, King County, Washington, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, SEI Investments Company, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Commerzbank AG, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, formerly known as The Bank of New York, QSR Management Limited, Moody's Investor Service, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
as 13-2283
Plaintiff:
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, King County, Washington, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, SEI Investments Company, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Commerzbank AG, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, The Bank of New York Mellon, formerly known as The Bank of New York and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Moody's Investor Service, Inc. and Moody's Investor Service, Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
