Cases 81 - 90 of 1,567
United States of America v. 39.287 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
39.287 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Sparks Family Partnership, Ltd., R. Seanne Sparks, Registered Agent, Unknown Heirs of Harry Landa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.26 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Desoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.26 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Desoto County, Mississippi, Richard B. Gentry and Focal Point Investment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee, Etc., and Camerino Lopez, Lopez, et al. (TV2)
as 1:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee, Etc., and Camerino Lopez, Lopez, et al., Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee, Etc., Camerino Lopez Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.46 Acre of Land, More or Less and Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land i
as 1:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.46 Acre of Land, More or Less and Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Meigs County, Tennessee, Ruben L McKenzie, III and Vennia Michele Brown McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee et al.
as 1:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America upon the Relation and for the use of Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee, and Jose F. Lopez, et ux., Veronica Lopez, Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Rhea County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00358
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, City of Roma, Rosario G Cuellar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, Eva V. Zuniga, Gaston Zuniga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, Jaime Resendez, Oneida Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, Amando Garza Hinojosa, Benita Rose Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, Felix Rodriguez Salinas, Unknown Heirs of Juliet G. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
