Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Stewart v. Brevard County, Florida
as 6:2023cv02326
Plaintiff: Lawrence Stewart
Defendant: Brevard County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi and Linda B. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.84 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.84 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Joel I. Stewart and Linda B. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
State of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, on behalf of the Heirs of Tract ID 8Q5 25 et al
as 4:2019cv00347
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, on behalf of the Heirs of Tract ID 8Q5 25, John Wilson, Nathaniel C Wilson, Jr and others
Plaintiff: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
State of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 4:2019cv00285
Defendant: Suzanne I Turnbull, Tracy L Stewart, Ruth M Mulder and others
Plaintiff: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00261
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879, Andrew David Horne, Ronald Wayne Ruple and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant: Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW, Audrey J. Baltoff, Frances Mae Musgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.03 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.01 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-36-10 et al
as 3:2018cv02139
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.03 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.01 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-36-10, MATTHEW WILLIAM KRIEGLER, MARIA LOUISE STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.25 Acre, more or less, in Northampton County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 4929-61-7783, Composed of 25 Acres, more or less, Identified in Book 55, Page 474 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00003
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.25 Acre, more or less, in Northampton County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 4929-61-7783, Composed of 25 Acres, more or less, Identified in Book 55, Page 474, The Unknown Remaining Heirs of Phil Gray Stewart and The Unknown Remaining Heirs of Boatman Bennett Cornelius Stewart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?