Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pascucci et al v. Town of Lynnfield et al
as 1:2021cv10920
Defendant: Chairman Christopher Barrett, Richard Dalton, Phillip Crawford and others
Plaintiff: Susan Pascucci and Michael Pascucci
Interested Party: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coachella Valley Association of Governments v. 52.462 Acres of Land et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv02419
Defendant: Elias Diaz, RUTH ELAINE PATENCIO, DESERT COVE GOLF RESORT, LLC and others
Plaintiff: COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Claimant: Palm Springs Motors Inc
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 0946
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.33 ACRES+TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.08 ACRES+ IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHHAMPTION COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,TAX PARCEL NO.H4-8-7-38 et al
as 5:2019cv01134
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC., MOORE TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9 et al
as 3:2018cv02001
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9, RONALD KAPPUS, JOHANNA KAPPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.36 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-3.06-13 et al
as 3:2018cv01938
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.36 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-3.06-13, PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.12 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-3-13, MICHAEL F. VOORHEES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.88 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.79 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-13-41 et al
as 3:2018cv01771
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.88 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.79 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-13-41, PHILIP H SNYDER, LINDA L. SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.36 Acre +- in Towamensing Township, Carbon County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 16D-56-A28 et al
as 3:2018cv00285
Plaintiff: PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant: A Permanent Easement of 0.36 Acre +- in Towamensing Township, Carbon County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 16D-56-A28 , Shane M. Conner , Diane C. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
State of Florida Department of Transportation v. Meadows Incorporated et al
as 3:2013cv01611
Petitioner: State of Florida Department of Transportation
Respondent: Meadows Incorporated, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., The United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. 0.48 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Cameron County, State of Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 0.48 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, Oscar Ceballos, Teresa Ceballos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP v. 0.22 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2012cv03416
Plaintiff: TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP
Defendant: 0.22 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, WA RESIDENTIAL URBAN RENEWAL COMPANY, L.L.C. , WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?