Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 3:2017cv03830
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKINS et al v. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv02299
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JENKINS and JEROME JOHNSON
Defendant:
NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Johnson v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dennis Johnson and Geraldine Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company, Orville Hobbs and Midwest Trans-Load, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2016cv14323
Plaintiff:
Kerwin M Smith
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 2:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Johnson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 16-2277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, also known as NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Campbell v. Hampton et al
as 4:2016cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Respondent:
Sharon Hampton, Barbra Johnson, Anthony Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dornan et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Armando Gonzalez, Does 1 to 50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BORD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv02773
Plaintiff:
Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
