Cases 101 - 110 of 629
Oles v. The United States of America
as 7:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ms. Debra J Oles and Debra Jean Oles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Lane et al v. Hedgebeth et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
Nathan A. Neisius and Robert A. Lane
Defendant:
William Henry Hedgebeth and The Vacation Property Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragans et al v. NAR Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA doing business as Chrysler Capital, NAR Services, NAR Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Valenica, Malcolm Eastlack Ragans and Miguel Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrow v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Defendant:
Melvin Snipes, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Morrow
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
HART v. RICCI et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Defendant:
JOHN P. RICCI, SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC and POOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RACHEL Y. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minoda v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Minoda
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DAVIS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
JASMINE S. DAVIS
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Napeau
as 5:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Jean G. Napeau
Plaintiff:
James C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Michael Troy Carter and ATS, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randy Wayne Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gustafson et al v. Bowers
as 7:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Candice Renee Gustafson, Johnny Ray Hammonds and Earl Ray Hammonds, Jr.
Defendant:
Barbara Dunaway Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
