Cases 31 - 40 of 51
King et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2014cv03318
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. King , Dawn L. Wheeler and Adrian J. Wheeler
Defendant:
Hampton Lee Taylor, Sr. and Hertrich of Pocomoke, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. Travelers Indemnity et al
as 4:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hampton
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company, The and Phoenix Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPO v. HAMPTON et al
as 2:2014cv04413
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CUPO
Defendant:
RONALD HAMPTON , JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DATTALO v. HAMPTON et al
as 2:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
THERESA G. DATTALO
Defendant:
CHARLES HAMPTON, AJB TRANSPORTATION INC. , HART LOGISTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carr v. Frank Martz Coach Company
as 13-4302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mark Carr and Nelda Hampton
Defendant - Appellant:
Frank Martz Coach Company, DBA Martz Trailways
Carr et al v. Frank Martz Coach Company
as 1:2013cv05525
Plaintiff:
Mark Carr and Nelda Hampton
Defendant:
Frank Martz Coach Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hamilton v. Hampton et al
as 2:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tawni Hamilton
Defendant:
John Hampton, Amerigas Propane LP Employee, Amerigas Propane LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grantham et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lakenya Stewart Grantham , Jakayla Grantham , Henry Hampton, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Omar M. Smith and Triple E Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton-Imperati v. USA et al
as 3:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
Susan Hampton-Imperati
Defendant:
USA and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Britton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
Sally Britton
Defendant:
United States of America and Robert Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
