Cases 71 - 80 of 631
Marks v. Turner et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Marks and Richard A. Marks, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Billy Ray Turner and Atlantic OBX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Gouge v. Jear Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Danny Gouge
Defendant:
Jear Logistics, LLC, Anyway Logistics, Inc., Austin A. Loza, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NICKLES v. GWYNN
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
DIANNE G. NICKLES
Defendant:
TABITHA BONITA GWYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Glasco et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Rogers
Defendant:
James Glasco, Glasco Trucking, LLC, K.L. Breeden & Sons, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rogers v. Glasco et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - See Case No: 5:22-cv-57-FL
as 7:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Rogers
Defendant:
James Glasco, Glasco Trucking, LLC and K.L. Breeden & Sons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Seay v. Webb
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Clant M. Seay
Defendant:
Tim Webb and Erin Cabe-Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Espinoza-Hernandez v. Archway Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Noel Alexander Espinoza-Hernandez
Defendant:
Archway Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
GRIFFIN v. HICKS
as 1:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
RYAN E. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JAMIE L. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
KITCHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
ALAN W. KITCHEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Auteri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Keawe Blade Auteri
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Randell Scott Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
