Cases 81 - 90 of 105
PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ
as 2:2014cv02271
Plaintiff:
INDU PATEL
Defendant:
CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HOANG et al v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOANG , KENNETH ROTHWEILER , FAITHLEE BROWN and others
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. , SABRINA ANDERSON and FIRSTGROUP AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vassell v. 2235016 Ontario, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12905
Plaintiff:
Wilks Vassell
Defendant:
2235016 Ontario, Inc. and Vijaykomar K. Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOT USED
as 2:2013cv02188
Plaintiff:
Francisca Acebedo-Cedillo, Rogelio Martinez and Salma Martinez
Defendant:
Shamit Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Martinez et al v. Patel
as 2:2013cv02189
Plaintiff:
Francisca Acebedo-Cedillo, Rogelio Martinez and Salma Martinez
Defendant:
Shamit Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Patel et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
Chandrakant Patel
Defendant:
Jonathan E Sanchez and Mary Manzuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patel v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv04787
Plaintiff:
Prachi Patel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SAUER et al v. PATEL et al
as 2:2013cv01949
Plaintiff:
TARA SAUER and JOHN SAUER
Defendant:
KISHAN PATEL , HASMUKHBHAI PATEL and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Patel v. Commerce Protective Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00068
Defendant:
Commerce Protective Insurance Company, Harvest Haul, Inc. and Dedric Jones
Plaintiff:
Dilipbhai Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PATEL et al v. ZHU
as 2:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
ARVINDBHAI PATEL and JAYSHREE PATEL
Defendant:
SONGDE ZHU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
