Cases 41 - 50 of 191,245
Thompson v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Sean Thompson
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Amado v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sarah Irene Amado
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kacy Lelievre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PERCELL v. REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
as 1:2024cv21940
Plaintiff:
TABRINA PERCELL
Defendant:
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PERCELL v. REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
as 1:2024cv21938
Plaintiff:
TABRINA PERCELL
Defendant:
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ortiz et al v. Vega
as 1:2024cv04140
Plaintiff:
Ana Ortiz and A.B.
Defendant:
Jose Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Matthews v. Mountain Portfolio Owner LA 2, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Latrinda Matthews
Defendant:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company, Mountain Portfolio Owner LA2, LLC, Brothers Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Lyman v. Driving Force Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lyman
Defendant:
Driving Force Logistics, LLC and Novae, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Jackson v. Parkland Memorial Hospital
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sir Gregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tipold v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Rosa C. Tipold
Defendant:
Tony Wayne Ross and Stephanie Dowdy Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel
as 24-5483
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
