Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Culafic v. Coilplus, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02550
Plaintiff:
Nicolas M. Culafic
Defendant:
Coilplus, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nardone v. Batie et al
as 9:2022cv80738
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Nardone
Defendant:
Christopher Batie, Swift Engineering, Inc., Aerotek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nardone v. Batie et al
as 9:2022cv80736
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Nardone
Defendant:
Christopher Batie, Swift Engineering, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Nardone v. Batie et al
as 9:2022cv80737
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Nardone
Defendant:
Christopher Batie, Swift Engineering, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Mollett v. Aerotek Inc et al
as 3:2020cv06168
Defendant:
Ellis & Associates Investigations LLC, Aerotek, Inc., Pinkerton Consulting & Investigations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Mollett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ordonez-Castellon v. Aerotek Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv06381
Defendant:
Allegis Group, Inc., Allegis Group Holdings, Inc., Aerotek Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Ordonez-Castellon and Minerva Lopez Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02660
Plaintiff:
Abraham Solis
Defendant:
Clean Harbors, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 875
Harding v. Aerotek Inc. (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nana Nicole Harding
Defendant:
Aerotek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drake, Andrew v. Aerotek, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00301
Plaintiff:
Andrew Drake
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coy v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Floyd Coy
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc. , James Squyres and David A Martens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
