Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARO v. FEDERAL BRONZE CASTING INC.
as 2:2024cv06503
Defendant:
FEDERAL BRONZE CASTING INC.
Plaintiff:
SEGUNDO HARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re: T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023md03073
Plaintiff:
Judith Lynch, Frankie J. Gonzalez, Lisa Frierson and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Perez, et al. v. Darling Ingredients, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mauricia Perez, Angela Cruz, Juan Cruz and others
Defendant:
John Does I - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sam Colby v. Javier Haro et al
as 2:2021cv09017
Plaintiff:
Sam Colby doing business as Eden Machinery
Defendant:
Javier Haro, Sr, Does 1-20 and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Haro v. GGP-Tucson Mall LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Maria Haro
Defendant:
GGP-Tucson Mall LLC , Millard Mall Services Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guzman-Haro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01466
Plaintiff:
Celia Guzman-Haro
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Suzanne Haro v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 8:2014cv00528
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated and Does
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Haro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
