Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Witherspoon v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Witherspoon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WITHERSPOON v. MENARD, INC.
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
JULIE WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Witherspoon v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Witherspoon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and WalMart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cloyd et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03714
Plaintiff:
Lucila Andrade, Nickalandra Witherspoon and Kevin Cloyd
Defendant:
KBR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon-Nimmons v. Old Navy LLC
as 1:2020cv03016
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Witherspoon-Nimmons
Defendant:
Old Navy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cloyd v. KBR
as 4:2020cv00985
Defendant:
KBR
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cloyd and Nickalandra Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WITHERSPOON v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv00508
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS VONSHAE WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gaston et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2018cv12337
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Bernadette Montalvo and others
Defendant:
Islamic Rebuplic Of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Gaston et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12338
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Tamia Howard and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Witherspoon v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12212
Plaintiff:
Demarcus James Witherspoon
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
