Cases 11 - 20 of 664
Searcy v. Gunter et al
as 1:2023cv03388
Plaintiff:
Deanna M Searcy
Defendant:
Heidi Barron, Manapreet Basi, Metro Community Provider Network, Inc. d/b/a Jeffco Family Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 2702 - Medical Malpractice by Govt. Medical Personnel
Berumen v. Godinez et al
as 1:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
Aracely Berumen
Defendant:
Alison Godinez, Plan De Salud Del Valle, Inc. doing business as Salud Family Health Centers and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Batista et al v. USA
as 3:2023cv01545
Plaintiff:
Soraida Batista and Oscar Perez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Brooks v. USA
as 4:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brooks
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Owens v. USA
as 4:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Joe P Owens
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mintah v. USA
as 3:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
Kiama Mintah
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ellis v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12323
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ellis
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniels v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07736
Plaintiff:
Ramona Daniels
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Seaton v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06995
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Seaton
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randall v. L'Oreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv06283
Plaintiff:
Leshell Randall
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
