Cases 21 - 30 of 36
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02797
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03282
Plaintiff:
STEVEN YINGER, KAREN WILSON, NEIL WHITT and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZAGER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03160
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANDERSEN, ZACH DANGERFIELD, KENNETH MCGAHA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walsh et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02223
Plaintiff:
Steven Yinger, Karen Wilson, Neil Whitt and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Zager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02143
Plaintiff:
Jessica Andersen, Zach Dangerfield, Kenneth McGaha and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Woods et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Refresco Group, N.V., Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Cott Beverages, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Woods and Michael Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04290
Plaintiff:
Melissa Wood and Michael Wood
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20632
Plaintiff:
Robin Lynn Wood and Jeffrey Michael Wood
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17720
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wood and Roy Michael Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv09487
Plaintiff:
Evamarie Woods and Michael Woods
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
