Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Caudill v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03520
Plaintiff:
Johnie Caudill
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Barbara Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caudill et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02577
Plaintiff:
Linda Sue Caudill and Roger Dale Caudill
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Dianne Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09086
Plaintiff:
Christie Caudill and Henry Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv09261
Plaintiff:
Victoria Caudill and Robert Adam Caudill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jackson , Carol Banks , Stephanie Caudill and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv26569
Plaintiff:
Darlene Caudill
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18256
Plaintiff:
Sandra Caudill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robin Rae Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
