Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04324
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith and Marion Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv08254
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith Green
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03266
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09522
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith and William D. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porst et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25369
Plaintiff:
Mildred Porst , Beverly Sellers , Myrtle Malcolm and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv19250
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith and Buddy Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. CBRE et al
as 3:2013cv04120
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith
Defendant:
CBRE , CBRE Inc , CBRE Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24242
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith and Fred Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Smith
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
