Cases 1 - 10 of 15
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02588
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22472
Plaintiff:
RANDALL L REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43886
Plaintiff:
FRED L REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21579
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07592
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONAVAN L REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58619
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Reeves, Sherri Reeves and Sherri L Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Reeves
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04537
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Reeves and Jeffrey Reeves
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03815
Plaintiff:
Monyuette Y Reeves and Raymond L Reeves
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
