Cases 1 - 10 of 19
campos v. Challenger Lifts, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01391
Defendant:
Carl Turner Equipment, Inc., Challenger Lifts, Inc. and Snap-On Incorporated
Plaintiff:
vladimir campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PHILLIPS v. SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
as 2:2019cv02229
Defendant:
MAC TOOLS and SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
DONNA PHILLIPS and JOHN PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson et al v. Alltrade Tools, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00891
Defendant:
Alltrade Tools, LLC, Snap-On Incorporated and Snap-On Tools Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cory Davidson and Sara Joanne Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency, LLC v. Snap-On et al
as 2:2016cv00786
Defendant:
Does, Snap-On Incorporated and Snap-On SecureCorp Inc.
Plaintiff:
Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency LLP
Selman Breitman LLP v. Snap-On Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00785
Intervenor:
Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency, LLC on behalf of ProCentury Insurance
Coordinating Discovery Attorney:
Selman Breitman LLP
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated
Jonathan Goble v. Snap-On et al
as 2:2015cv08706
Defendant:
Does, Snap-On, Snap-On Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goble
Warren v. Snap-on Incorporated
as 4:2015cv04104
Plaintiff:
Mark E Warren
Defendant:
Snap-on Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHMITT v. SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
as 2:2015cv01631
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCHMITT
Defendant:
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schultz v. Snap-On Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Schultz, Jr.
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated and Snap-On Tools Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRAIG et al v. PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION et al
as 5:2014cv03036
Plaintiff:
GILBERT CRAIG and MARY CRAIG
Defendant:
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION , SNAP-TITE INCORPORATED and PARKER SNAP-TITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
