Cases 1 - 7 of 7
POSEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22245
Plaintiff:
RHONDA RUSHTON BARNES and SAUNDRA KENNEDY POSEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARNES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., et al
as 3:2023cv21661
Plaintiff:
DAVIES MORGWEN and RHONDA RUSHTON BARNES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.,, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.,, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUSHTON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv13281
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELE RUSHTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSHTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02033
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rushton
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushton v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv03085
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Rushton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEENUM v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03007
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
HUNTER RUSHTON KEENUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Rushton and Connie Rushton
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
