Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19139
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF HERMENIE SMITH and TODD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv00887
Plaintiff:
Suzanne E. Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03741
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
KAREN K. SMITH and TODD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Smith v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02547
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01177
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2014cv06556
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 4:2014cv03060
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
Lori Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
