Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,826
Simpson et al v. American International Industries et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00153
Defendant: Brenntag Specialties LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, American International Industries (sued individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed. Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed. Pinaud, and Nestle-Le Mur Company), all for the Clubman line of products and others
Plaintiff: Neil Simpson, James Taylor and Lonita Deanna Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webb et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00145
Defendant: 3M Company, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Bayer Samson II LLC and others
Plaintiff: Allan Watson, Robin A. Webb, Cynthia M. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
EDLEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 3:2022cv02970
Plaintiff: DANIEL EDLEY, ROGER EDLEY and ESTATE OF LASZLO LOUIS EDLEY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHN/JANE DOE ATTORNEYS 1-1000 and JOHN/JANE DOE J&J CORPORATE MEMBERS 1-1000
Interested Party: IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., IMERYS TALC VERMONT, INC. and IMERYS TALC CANADA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant: Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dickenson v. Brenntag North America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02068
Defendant: Brenntag Specialties LLC, Brenntag North America, Inc., Brenntag Specialties, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dennis Dickenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wisener v. Revlon Consumer Products Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00243
Defendant: Arkema Inc (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Wallance & Tiernan d/b/a WTS Pharmacraft) for its Desenex line of products formerly known as Pennwalt Corporation formerly known as ELF Atochem North America Inc, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Brenntag Specialties LLC and others
Plaintiff: Naomi Wisener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stratford v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02414
Plaintiff: Sylvia Stratford
Defendant: John Crane Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc., GG of Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Pagan-Loyola et al v. American International Industries et al
as 3:2021cv01625
Plaintiff: Victor J Pagan-Loyola and Thelma L Viera-Perez
Defendant: American International Industries, ARYZ CORP, AUTHENTIC BRANDS GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant Cochran et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09612
Plaintiff: Grant Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CRANE CO. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY);, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?