Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Hendrix v. Regions Bank, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00430
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Hendrix
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc) (Alabama)
as 16-16849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIDWEST FEEDERS, INC., a Kansas Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK (INC) (ALABAMA), an Alabama Corporation
Regions Bank v. Kaplan et al
as 8:2016cv02867
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Marvin I. Kaplan, Kathryn Kaplan, R1A Palms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle 2010 Historic Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership v. Regions Bank
as 3:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Carlisle 2010 Historic Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Hall et al
as 6:2015cv03456
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis , Sharon Davis , Bradley P Davis and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Siegel , Richard Wimmer , Gregory Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Bing Charles Kearney, Jr., et al
as 15-11101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK, an Alabama State chartered bank, as successor-in-interest to AmSouth Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
BING CHARLES W. KEARNEY, JR. and TONYA NUHFER KEARNEY
MIDWEST FEEDERS INC v. REGIONS BANK (INC) (ALABAMA)
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
MIDWEST FEEDERS INC
Defendant:
REGIONS BANK (INC) (ALABAMA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catherine Harvill v. F. Harvill, et al
as 14-6141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHERINE EVANS HARVILL
Defendant - Appellee:
F. EVANS HARVILL and REGIONS BANK
Regions Bank v. Rome et al
as 1:2014cv03894
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Daniel Rome, Ezra Rome and Harriet Rome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Johnson et al v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Margaret R Johnson, Margaret J Kell and Catherine A Johnson
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Fred Speakman, Darlene Bannis and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
