Cases 41 - 49 of 49
ORTIZ v. SCHMIDT
as 2:2010cv05403
Plaintiff:
HENRY ORTIZ
Defendant:
REGINA SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Miller
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SCHMIDT V HARRIS, ET AL
as 3:2008cv00570
Plaintiff:
LESLIE A SCHMIDT
Defendant:
JOHN A HARRIS, CYNTHIA D HARRIS and KATE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Crawford v. Adams, et al
as 6:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
Kelly M Crawford
Defendant:
Steve Adams, Melinda Dawn Barnes, Melissa Blackshear and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J&J Landscapes LTD. et al v. 02HR, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10941
Plaintiff:
J&J Landscapes LTD. and V. Civitano Landscaping, LTD
Defendant:
02HR, LLC, 02HR Agricultural Services, Inc., 02HR III, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
J&J Landscapes LTD. et al v. 02HR, LLC et al
as 7:2008cv10941
Defendant:
Bertram Danzig, Richard Roes I-X, 02HR III, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
J&J Landscapes LTD. and V. Civitano Landscaping, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Schmidt v. Wachovia Bank
as 3:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Schmidt
Defendant:
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schmidt v. eNom, Incorporated et al
as 3:2008cv00317
Plaintiff:
Peter Schmidt
Defendant:
eNom, Incorporated, Namecheap.com and Edijs Skoromko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Schmidt et al v. D'Alessandro & Woodyard Commercial Realtors, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Schmidt and Judy R. Schmidt
Defendant:
D'Alessandro & Woodyard Commercial Realtors, Inc., D'Alessandro & Woodyard Commercial Realtors, Inc., D'Alessandro & Woodyard Commercial Realtors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
