Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
US ex rel. Hrayr Shahinian, MD v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
as 18-56532
Plaintiff / Appellant: HRAYR SHAHINIAN, M.D., F.A.C.S., an individual; Realtor ex rel. USA; on behalf of the United States of America, the District of Columbia, the City of Chicago, and the states of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Il
Defendant / Appellee: KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Maltese et al v. Pharmerica Corporation et al
as 8:2017cv01037
Defendant: Pharmerica Corporation, Mark Swann, Susan Swepston and others
Plaintiff: Jab Cross LLC and Joseph Maltese
Petitioner: State of Florida and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Shatish Patel, et al v. Catholic Health Initiatives, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-20395
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHATISH PATEL, Medical Doctor, ex rel. and HEMALATHA VIJAYAN, Medical Doctor, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee: CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, ST. LUKE'S HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION, ST. LUKE'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-SUGARLAND and others
Davis et al v. Hennepin County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv01551
Plaintiff: Leslie Davis , John D. Westley and USA
Defendant: Hennepin County, Deborah Hedlund, SANDIA NATIONAL LABS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Rune Kraft v. CalPortland Construction, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55594
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUNE KRAFT, Realtor; ex rel. United States of America; ex rel. State of California
Defendant - Appellee: CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION, CALPORTLAND COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
United States of America, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00452
Plaintiff: United States of America, Ellen M. McCracken, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company, Shapiro & Sutherland LLC, K. Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Jane Winter v. Gardens Regional Hospital and, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55020
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE WINTER, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: GARDENS REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a California corporation, DBA Tri-City Regional Medical Center, ROLLINSNELSON LTC CORP., a California corporation, VICKI ROLLINS and others
n v. The Lambert Firm PLC, et al
as 17-35844
Intervenor - Appellant: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, GAP, PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC., POGO and CURTIS HALL, putative intervenor
Appellee: THE LAMBERT FIRM PLC, Former Counsel for Gary Brunson
Defendant - Appellee: BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, URS CORPORATION and others
Vincent Hascoet, et al v. Morpho S.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16915
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT HASCOET, ex rel. United States of America; State of California and PHILIPPEE PACAUD DESBOIS, ex rel. United States of America; State of California
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee: MORPHO S.A., a French corporation, AKA Safran Identity & Security, S.A. and SAFRAN GROUP, S.A., a French corporation
Estate of Harold Lee Richards v. Lifepoint Healthcare
as 17-2009
Plaintiff - Appellant: ESTATE OF HAROLD LEE RICHARDSON, TERESA RICHARDSON, Co-Administrator, individually and on behalf of The United States of America and JOHN G. STEPHENS, Co-Administrator, individually and on behalf of The United States of America
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: LIFEPOINT HEALTHCARE, DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and DUKE LIFEPOINT HEALTHCARE
Defendant: DANVILLE HOSPITAL, DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, including their autopsy service or provider, DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?