Cases 91 - 100 of 161
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv03602
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO US, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02401
Defendant:
HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC., SANDOZ, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SELF-INSURED SCHOOLS OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH PLAN, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL WORKERS' HEALTH PLAN, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01900
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01216
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
THE KROGER CO. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, LLC, H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY L.P. and THE KROGER CO.
Defendant:
PLIVA, INC., HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., SANDOZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
WEST VAL PHARMACY et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03816
Plaintiff:
HALLIDAY'S & KOIVISTO'S PHARMACY, DEAL DRUG PHARMACY, FALCONER PHARMACY, INC. and others
Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
WEST VAL PHARMACY et al v. MYLAN, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03807
Plaintiff:
WEST VAL PHARMACY , HALLIDAY'S & KOIVISTO'S PHARMACY , RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
