Antitrust Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 247
Brown et al v. Amazon.com Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff: Christopher Brown, Scott Graeber, Laura Loes and others
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court: In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff: David Granata, James Rowe, Stephen Dowe and others
Defendant: Pratt & Whitney, a Division of Raytheon Technologies Corporation, QuEST Global Services-NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tom Conroy, Christopher Novoa, Scott Prentiss and others
Consolidated Defendant: Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator, Does 1-50 and others
Amicus Curiae: American Staffing Association
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Conroy et al v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01659
Plaintiff: Tom Conroy, Daniel Sartoris, Christopher Novoa and others
Defendant: Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant: Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated et al v. Google, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06794
Plaintiff: Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated, J.O. Emmerich & Associates, Inc., Delta-Democrat Publishing Company and others
Defendant: Google LLC and Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff: Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party: The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated et al v. Google, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00274
Defendant: Facebook, Inc. and Google, LLC
Plaintiff: Kosciusko Star-Herald, Inc., Clarke Publishing, Inc., Marion Publishing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Keech v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00741
Plaintiff: Scai Holdings, LLC and Scott Keech
Defendant: Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC, Company A and Company B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?