Antitrust Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Campbell County Auto Body, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06018
Plaintiff: Campbell County Auto Body, Inc.
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , State Farm Fire and Casualty Company , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv06014
Defendant: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC and Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Interested Party: Tonkon Torp, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06011
Defendant: Affirmative Insurance Company, USAA General Indemnity Company, Esurance Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: S. Danihel Collission, Inc., Knebel Autobody Center, Inc., Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06010
Plaintiff: Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mercury Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, Wawanesa General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Legends Collision LLC et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv06006
Defendant: Travelers Property Casualty Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Raintree Auto Body Incorporated, Robert K Isham, Jan's European Auto Body Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Haury's Auto Body et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. et al
as 6:2014cv06015
Defendant: Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Farmers Insurance Company of Washington and others
Plaintiff: Center Collision, LLC, Collision Masters, LLC, Eurotech Bodywerkes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Rodenhouse Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06007
Defendant: Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Hanover American Insurance Company, The, Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Professional Finish, Inc., Lantagne's Auto Body, LLC, H.D. Way Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv08682
Defendant: 21st Century Insurance Company, AMICA Mutual Insurance Company, Alliance United Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., D and M Auto Body, Inc. and others
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 3:2014cv01777
Defendant: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, American National Property and Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff: Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Haury's Auto Body et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. et al
as 2:2014cv01723
Defendant: Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Farmers Insurance Company of Washington and others
Plaintiff: Haury's Auto Body, Inc doing business as Haury's Lake City Collision, Center Collision, LLC, Collision Masters, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?