Antitrust Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3867
Plaintiff - Appellee: The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3864
Plaintiff - Appellee: The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, AKA Macmillian and Apple Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3857
Plaintiff - Appellee: The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Apple Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff: The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant: Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant: ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court: M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff: THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al Featured Case
as 1:2011cv01560
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , STATE OF OHIO and others
Defendant: AT&T INC. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Movant: GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ELECTION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00380
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant: ELECTION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?