Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 75
OH, ex rel. Dave Yost v. Ascent Health Services, LLC, et al
as 24-3033
Plaintiff: STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. and DAVE YOST, Attorney General of Ohio
Defendant: ASCENT HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., CIGNA GROUP and others
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Louisiana Children's Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01890
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Louisiana Children's Medical Center and HCA Healthcare Inc
Intervenor: Attorney General State of Louisiana
State of Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost Attorney General of Ohio v. Ascent Health Services LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01450
Plaintiff: State of Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost Attorney General of Ohio
Defendant: Ascent Health Services LLC, Express Scripts, Inc., Cigna Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HCA Healthcare Inc v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2023cv01311
Plaintiff: HCA Healthcare Inc
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Louisiana Children's Medical Center v. Attorney General of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff: Louisiana Children's Medical Center d/b/a LCMC Health and Louisiana Children's Medical Center doing business as LCMC Health
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: HCA Healthcare Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Consolidated Defendant: Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare et al
as 2:2020cv02835
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee Office of the Attorney General and Reporter and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Tenet Healthcare Corporation and Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
State of Louisiana v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00638
Defendant: J. P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., JEFFERIES GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF LOUISIANA, by and through its Attorney General, JEFF LANDRY and State Of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Attorney General v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01047
Defendant: Unitedhealth Group, Inc., Davita, Inc., Collaborative Care Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Attorney General for State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?