Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Walgreen Co. et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01032
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co. , The Kroger Co. , Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walgreen Co., et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
WALGREEN CO. et al v. WYETH, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06985
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant:
WYETH, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Walgreen Co. et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co. , Kroger Co. , Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
ALBERTSON'S LLC et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al
as 1:2009cv02132
Plaintiff:
Albertson's llc, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. and Heb grocery company, lp
Defendant:
Cadbury Schweppes PLC, Cadbury adams usa llc, Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Walgreen Co. et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03019
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co., Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ALBERTSON'S LLC et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al
as 2:2009cv04380
Plaintiff:
ALBERTSON'S LLC, THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. and HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP
Defendant:
CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC, CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, CADBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
