Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In re : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02796
Defendant:
: German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, Audi of America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Briscoe, Marilyn Fong, Travis Burton and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert B. Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
as 1:2014md01720
Defendant:
Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Airtran Airways, Inc, Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and others
323) 931-4990 (fax:
Little Pub Holdings, LLC and Tavern Hospitality Group Holdings, LLC
Objector:
National Federation of Independent Businesses and Vicente Consulting LLC
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Avis Budget Group, Inc., Avis Rent A Car System LLC, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa International Service Assocation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Salem Women's Clinic, Inc., et al v. Salem Hospital, et al
as 08-35741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALEM WOMEN'S CLINIC, INC. and ELIZABETH R. HARMON, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
SALEM HOSPITAL, an Oregon hospital non-profit corporation, SALEM CLINIC, MARGARET EGELAND and others
Harmon v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02962
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Harmon, Robert S. Harmon and Robert S. Harmon
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Harmon v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv02938
Plaintiff:
Robert Harmon, Robert Harmon and Robert Harmon
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Salem Women's Clinic, Inc. et al v. Salem Hospital
as 6:2007cv06092
Plaintiff:
Salem Women's Clinic, Inc. and Elizabeth R. Harmon
Defendant:
Salem Hospital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Harmon v. Alliance Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv01618
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Harmon, Robert S. Harmon, Robert S. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Etron Technology Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Harmon v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert S Harmon, Robert S Harmon and Robert S Harmon
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc and ATI Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
