Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00964
Defendant: Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, State Farm General Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: David C. Brosius doing business as Martins Auto Body Works, Inc., Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., Whiteford Collision and Refinishing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Concord Auto Body, Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01857
Defendant: Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Concord Auto Body, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell County Auto Body, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00179
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Campbell County Auto Body, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Auto Body Shop Antitrust Litigation
as 6:2014md02557
Defendant: First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Taylor Auto Body L L C, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C, Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Professional, Inc v. First Choice Auto Insurance Company, et al
as 6:2018cv06023
Defendant: Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Mutual Benefit Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Professional, Inc. and Professional, Inc. doing business as Professionals Auto Body
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Indiana Autobody Association,, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-13601
Defendant / Appellee: ALLSTATE VEHICLE & PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, SHELTER GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARKSVILLE COLLISION CENTER, INC., BROTHERS BODY AND PAINT OF MORGAN COUNTY, INC., MINTON BODY SHOP, INC. and others
Alpine Straightening Systems, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDON COLLISION CENTER, L.L.C., A.F. COLLISION REPAIR, INC., CHRIS BODY & PAINT, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee: USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE and others
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv06014
Defendant: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC and Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Interested Party: Tonkon Torp, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Legends Collision LLC et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv06006
Defendant: Travelers Property Casualty Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Raintree Auto Body Incorporated, Robert K Isham, Jan's European Auto Body Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06010
Plaintiff: Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mercury Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, Wawanesa General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?