Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant: Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Gill et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04379
Plaintiff: Taje Gill, Esterphanie St. Juste and Benjamin Valdez
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eliades et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05134
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Plaintiff: John Boisi, Jonathan Swaby, Nathan Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Davitashvili et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03000
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., DoorDash Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mia Sapienza, Adam Bensimon and Mariam Davitashvili
Consolidated Plaintiff: Philip Eliades, Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi and others
Not Classified By Court: Cheeseboat Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv07440
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff: SC Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Philadelphia Taxi Association, et al v. Uber Technologies Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION INC
Defendant - Appellee: UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
Max Luc Taxi, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10316
Plaintiff: Max Luc Taxi, Inc, Max Luc Taxi, Inc., Tiger Taxi, Inc. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Interested Party: Anoush Cab, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12538
Plaintiff: Malden Transportation, Inc. , PEGM Transportation, LLC , Medford Trans., Inc. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. , Governor Charles Baker and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv06385
Plaintiff: Desoto Cab Company, Inc.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. , Uber USA, LLC , Rasier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?