Banks and Banking Cases
Richard Hvizdak v. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD C. HVIZDAK
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, RBS CITIZENS, RBS CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THINK FINANCE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: THINK FINANCE, INC., TC LOAN SERVICE LLC, ELEVATE CREDIT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1831
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THINK FINANCE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv07139
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: THINK FINANCE, INC. , TC LOAN SERVICE, LLC , ELEVATE CREDIT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1831
Wroblewski v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
as 2:2014cv13718
Plaintiff: Christopher Wroblewski
Defendant: PNC Bank, National Association , Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee on behalf of the certificate-holders of the MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2004-11, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, S and MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2004-11, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2004-11
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
HVIZDAK v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00406
Plaintiff: RICHARD C. HVIZDAK
Defendant: CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA , RBS CITIZENS, NA , CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, NAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CROOKER v. CREDITRON FINANCIAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2009cv00168
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER
Defendant: CREDITRON FINANCIAL SERVICE, AAS DEBT RECOVERY, INC., F.H. CANN & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?