Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Jordan v. Day et al
as 3:2020cv02948
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Defendant:
Doyle Collins, C. Glenn Day and Harville Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 0:2020cv02250
Plaintiff:
Laquinta S. Bouknight, D. C. and D. G.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Kermisha Golden, Sani Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Georgetown, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Ricky Martin, Sheldon A Butts, Rudolph A Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
African Americans United States et al v. United States Office of the President
as 3:2019cv01722
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead, African Americans United States and Brenda Cecelia Clark Armstead
Defendant:
United States Office of the President
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2019cv00806
Plaintiff:
Randolph Martin
Defendant:
Contractor Kershaw County Enforcement, Contractor Janet C. Hasty, Contractor Kershaw County Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Day et al
as 3:2018cv02869
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Defendant:
Doyle Collins, C. Glenn Day and Harville Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Politics Club v. Osborne et al
as 2:2018cv02335
Defendant:
Jill Caldwell, Brian R McGee, Christine Workman and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Politics Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 7:2018cv01725
Plaintiff:
C H
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services and C Estrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pidanick v. LaRosa et al
as 9:2018cv01534
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Pidanick
Defendant:
Paul C LaRosa, III and Chris Sankowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
