Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Watson v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Watson
Defendant:
Hennepin County, Nick Peterson and J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glover v. Jensen et al
as 0:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Mike Jensen, Justin Maalis, Anthony Stoehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Devisme et al v. Center City Housing Company et al
as 0:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Andrew Devisme and Anthony Devisme
Defendant:
Center City Housing Company and Duluth Minnesota Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prosper v. Angrimson et al
as 0:2021cv00627
Defendant:
Anthony Hamlin, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tybetha Will Prosper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valiant v. Leonard, MD et al
as 0:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Amanda Ross, Todd Leonard, MD, MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valiant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Aspire Bank
as 0:2020cv01893
Defendant:
Aspire Bank
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aden v. City of Bloomington, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Officer Anthony Kiehl, Officer Adam Steir, City of Edina, Minnesota and others
Plaintiff:
Sumaya Aden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Khalif v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2020cv01354
Plaintiff:
Habso Khalif and Habso A. Khalif
Defendant:
Officer Scot Kaiser, Officer Anthony Maisano and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganrude v. Crowson
as 0:2020cv01143
Defendant:
Anthony James Crowson
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Ganrude
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Ganrude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Beltrami County et al
as 0:2019cv02580
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC, Tyler Carraway, Brandon Feldt and others
Plaintiff:
Del Shea Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
